| Takahashi FSQ-85ED or WO Pleiades 111? | |
|---|---|
| Takahashi | |
| pleiades 111 | |
| Login to vote and view results. |
0.00
#...
·
 |
|---|
|
hello everybody, so im just trying to get some opinions on this because im still thinking about what scope I should buy. so I was planning on buying the WO pleiades 111 to use, because the f number seems so good on that ( and honestly I don't know many telescopes manufacturers). I will be using a qhy294M with Chroma filters (LRGBSHO) and im still thinking about later in the future to buy a Full frame mono camera( still deciding if from qhy or zwo) and everything paid up with the eagle. now In the future I want to do huge mosaics (that's why full frame later down the road), and in genera I like a more wider field than most people. now my question is, what would be better suited, the pleiades 111 or Takahashi? on paper i guess the Takahashi takes the place bc as I said I want to do mosaics and i can pair up the Takahashi with a reducer and get wider field with lower f. I want to know what your guys experience is with the Takahashi FSQ-85ED.  |
|
0.00
#...
·
|
|---|
|
I also recently discovered the Takahashi FSQ-106 ED wich I think is more suited for full frame? I just saw the video of bray falls showing off all the scopes that he has and he talked good about this scope. specs also look good, that price is a bit soaring to look at but ive been saving up for a long time anyway, I want to get something really great that will pump out great mosaics |
