This is an image of M44 taken with my new Astro-Tech AT60EDP, an ASI294MC Pro and and L-Pro filter. The data is 2 hours of lights, plus darks, biases and flats. The image was processed in Pixinsight
GraXpert
SPCC
BlurXterminator
NoiseXterminator
MaskedStretch
CurvesTransformation
I'm looking for an explanation for the distorted halo on the bright star at the top-left in what I think is an otherwise nice image. Any ideas ?
 |
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Do you have the distorted halo on a single sub?
Or…
After stacking. But before any other processing?
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Looks like focuser/camera tilt issue here.
Check using tilt adjustment programs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQUmcIOQT2A |
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
|
That is normal behavior for halos.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Sean Mc:
Do you have the distorted halo on a single sub?
Or…
After stacking. But before any other processing?
It seems to happening in the final integration step in Pixinsight. I did not see the halo when I blinked through the registers frames.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Abhijit Juvekar:
Looks like focuser/camera tilt issue here.
Check using tilt adjustment programs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQUmcIOQT2A
If it was a tilt issue there would distortions in other stars.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
andrea tasselli:
That is normal behavior for halos.
Thanks. That being the case I have a few additional questions:
Can you provide a link to an image with similar behavior ?
Is there a solution ? Is it due to the L-Pro filter ?
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
|
All stars in your image have such halos. It's only that it's easier to see on bright stars. If you integrate 10x longer, you will see such halos on other stars. Or, in this particular image, if you look hard enough, you will see a similar halo behind the bright blue star in the upper-right edge. This must be caused by some internal reflection between optical surfaces in your optics/camera. Usually the filter is the first candidate of causing such halos.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Wei-Hao Wang:
All stars in your image have such halos. It's only that it's easier to see on bright stars. If you integrate 10x longer, you will see such halos on other stars. Or, in this particular image, if you look hard enough, you will see a similar halo behind the bright blue star in the upper-right edge. This must be caused by some internal reflection between optical surfaces in your optics/camera. Usually the filter is the first candidate of causing such halos.
Thank you. I see what you mean. Next chance I get I'll try taking the filter off.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
|
This can sometimes happen with BlurX, as it tries to correct star shapes but doesn't always grab the related halo. Easy to test: Just do your usual workflow without BX and see if the artifact is the same.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Dave Rust:
This can sometimes happen with BlurX, as it tries to correct star shapes but doesn't always grab the related halo. Easy to test: Just do your usual workflow without BX and see if the artifact is the same.
Thanks. It’s already there in the stacked image before further processing.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
An interference filter reflects back the light that it doesn't let through so the fault is in general with the optics for a broadband LP filter such as the L-Pro. I have used it time and time again with no issue whatsoever. Also, large FOVs are complicit in this as it becomes more apparent the larger the FOV is.
Note: the reflections depends on how good the off-band reflectivity values (which is a measure of the properties of the anti-reflection coatings) of the filters are and in general they are not great (OD~2/3) for the standard L-Pro because are aimed at reproducing natural color as well as possible while rejecting LP emission lines. A tighter filter might have less of similar issues but lower color fidelty reproduction.
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
I'm afraid this is totally normal with interference filters (though some filters and filter brands do it more or less than others). The halo is a slightly out-of-focus reflection of the star itself. It is off-center because the star is in the corner of the frame. For stars in the middle of the frame, the halo would be centered on the star. It's not an artifact from processing, and it's not because you did anything wrong. It's not tilt, or any indication of an optical problem.
For an open cluster like M44, I would recommend skipping the L-Pro filter. You're not trying to draw out any faint nebulosity that might be hidden underneath your light pollution. Rather, you are trying to show accurate colors on some very bright stars. While the filter may be cutting down on the overall light pollution, that isn't necessary for a subject like this one. Try without the filter. You may see a brighter light pollution gradient than you get without the L-Pro, that's easy enough to get rid of in processing, and you'll be left with the ability to get more accurate star colors without the halos.
- Jared
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
Jared Willson:
I'm afraid this is totally normal with interference filters (though some filters and filter brands do it more or less than others). The halo is a slightly out-of-focus reflection of the star itself. It is off-center because the star is in the corner of the frame. For stars in the middle of the frame, the halo would be centered on the star. It's not an artifact from processing, and it's not because you did anything wrong. It's not tilt, or any indication of an optical problem.
For an open cluster like M44, I would recommend skipping the L-Pro filter. You're not trying to draw out any faint nebulosity that might be hidden underneath your light pollution. Rather, you are trying to show accurate colors on some very bright stars. While the filter may be cutting down on the overall light pollution, that isn't necessary for a subject like this one. Try without the filter. You may see a brighter light pollution gradient than you get without the L-Pro, that's easy enough to get rid of in processing, and you'll be left with the ability to get more accurate star colors without the halos.
- Jared
Thank you very much.
I'll be trying it without the filter as soon as the weather permits.
Turns out that Arizona has a lot more cloudy nights than most people realize !
|
You cannot like this item. Reason: "ANONYMOUS".
You cannot remove your like from this item.
Editing a post is only allowed within 24 hours after creating it.
You cannot Like this post because the topic is closed.
0.00
2.41
2.71
11.22
4.13
